[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delete-process bug
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: delete-process bug |
Date: |
Thu, 25 May 2006 16:59:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> I think in order to avoid such race-conditions without waiting for
> the process's death, we'll need to remember those processes that
> were deleted but aren't dead yet. Of course, it goes against the
> docstring of `delete-process' which says "forget about it
> immediately". But we don't need to keep the whole process around;
> just the PID should be enough, kept in a list of "deleted but not
> dead" PIDs.
> +static Lisp_Object live_deleted_processes;
> +
"live-deleted"? How about calling them "undead processes"? They are
pretty much zombies.
Sounds geekier.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Ispell loads dict twice., Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/23
- Re: Ispell loads dict twice., Agustin Martin, 2006/05/24
- delete-process bug (was: Ispell loads dict twice.), Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug (was: Ispell loads dict twice.), Agustin Martin, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, David Kastrup, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/26
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/26
- Re: delete-process bug, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/26
- Re: delete-process bug, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/26
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/26