[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delete-process bug
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: delete-process bug |
Date: |
Fri, 26 May 2006 23:36:47 -0400 |
> Suppose it comes between there and the call to remove_process?
> Does the right thing happen in all these cases?
I think so. In fact, synchronous process will be said to be dead, but
as we are calling at this moment delete-process, we are not working
with any synchronous processes.
Thanks for checking.
Please add a comment explaining why there is no race condition if
SIGCHLD comes in during those lines.
- Re: delete-process bug, (continued)
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, David Kastrup, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, David Kastrup, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/26
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/26
- Re: delete-process bug, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/25
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/26
- Re: delete-process bug,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/26
- Re: delete-process bug, Michael Mauger, 2006/05/26
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/27
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/27
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/27
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/28