[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delete-process bug
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: delete-process bug |
Date: |
Mon, 29 May 2006 10:14:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: address@hidden (Kim F. Storm)
>> Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 23:15:58 +0200
>> Cc: Agustin Martin <address@hidden>,
>> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>>
>> But I also wonder if any of the async process stuff actually works
>> without SIGCHLD ?!? Are there any systems which support async processes
>> but don't have SIGCHLD?
>
> AFAIK, MS-Windows is such a system. (I didn't track this discussion,
> so I don't know if the Windows case is relevant to it.)
Well, there is this piece of code (in a context where signo == SIGCHLD):
#if (defined WINDOWSNT \
|| (defined USG && !defined GNU_LINUX \
&& !(defined HPUX && defined WNOHANG)))
#if defined (USG) && ! defined (POSIX_SIGNALS)
signal (signo, sigchld_handler);
#endif
But... if MS-Windows does not support SIGCHLD (or SIGCLD), how does
emacs detect process termination on MS-Windows??
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: delete-process bug, (continued)
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, David Kastrup, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/30
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/30
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/30