[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
From: |
Reiner Steib |
Subject: |
Re: PURESIZE increased (again) |
Date: |
Tue, 30 May 2006 21:40:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat, Apr 29 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Reiner Steib <address@hidden>
>> On Fri, Apr 28 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>
>> > I think it's time to see whether the *.elc files we use are identical.
>> > Can you upload a couple of worst offenders, say, files.elc and
>> > simple.elc? I'd like to compare them to mine.
[...]
> I compared these with the versions compiled on a 32-bit Windows host,
> and they seem to be identical, except for 2 aspects:
>
> . Source files, whose absolute file names appear in a comment at the
> beginning of the .elc files. These are in comments, so they are
> obviously not the reason for the differences in pure space usage.
>
> . Minor differences in the defvar's and custom forms, like these:
>
> -(defvar backup-inhibited nil (#$ . 2763))
> +(defvar backup-inhibited nil (#$ . 2801))
[...]
>
> Meanwhile, I will try to prepare a GDB session that we could use to
> compare the pure space allocation during loadup.
I just wanted to state that I still need to use
"-DSITELOAD_PURESIZE_EXTRA=100000" to avoid an overflow on x86_64
(GNU/Linux) even after the recent increase of BASE_PURESIZE[1]. 90000
is not sufficient. On i686 (GNU/Linux) I need 140000 (130000 is not
sufficient).
Bye, Reiner.
[1]
,----
| 2006-05-24 Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden>
|
| * puresize.h (BASE_PURESIZE): Increase to 1210000.
`----
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again),
Reiner Steib <=