[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:23:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> when pop-up-frames is customized to t, the frames proliferate without
>> end and have to be explicitly deleted.
>> e.g., C-x m (`compose-mail') now creates a new frame that does not go
>> away automatically when I hit C-c C-c (`message-send-and-exit').
> one way to handle this would be to make all frames created by
> display-buffer (as opposed to an explicit C-x 5 2 `make-frame-command')
> dedicated.
That's indeed what I've implemented here (and proposed, but only for
post-22), by making "dedicated" into a 3-valued variable (a window can be
softly-dedicated, which basically means "this window was created in order to
display the current buffer" but doesn't prevent switching to another
buffer).
Stefan
- pop-up-frames inconvenience, Sam Steingold, 2006/06/05
- RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Drew Adams, 2006/06/05
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/06/05
- RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Drew Adams, 2006/06/05
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Sam Steingold, 2006/06/05
- RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Drew Adams, 2006/06/06
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/06
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, John S. Yates, Jr., 2006/06/06
Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Sam Steingold, 2006/06/05
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/05