[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: PURESIZE increased (again) |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Jun 2006 22:55:15 +0300 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:57:41 +0200
>
> 9.2 has gcc 3.3.4, whereas 10.0 has 4.0.2.
Thanks.
> > Can people who know about SUSE think of any differences between these
> > two versions that could explain the difference in pure space usage?
>
> I could think of data alignment being an issue
The overflow happens on 9.2, but not on 10.0. Is it plausible that
GCC 3.3.4 on SuSe 9.2 produces code with higher alignment requirements
than GCC 4.0.2 on SuSe 10.0?
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/06/03
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/06/09
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/06/09
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/06/09
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/06/09
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/06/10
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/06/10
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/06/10