[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc string for face-attribute-relative-p doesn't help
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: doc string for face-attribute-relative-p doesn't help |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:12:57 +0900 |
"John S. Yates, Jr." <address@hidden> writes:
> Backing off and focusing only on terminology for describing
> definitions, I find "in terms of", "as a function of" or "based
> on" all easier to swallow than "defined relative to".
The key point is whether the value in question acts as an absolute
setting, or whether it acts as a modifier (including the "null modifier"
`unspecified') for the (absolute) value in an underlying face.
[I probably use the term "relative" to contrast with "absolute" out of
habit, from typical usage when describing filenames.]
-Miles
--
My spirit felt washed. With blood. [Eli Shin, on "The Passion of the Christ"]
- RE: doc string for face-attribute-relative-p doesn't help, (continued)
- RE: doc string for face-attribute-relative-p doesn't help, Drew Adams, 2006/06/26
- Re: doc string for face-attribute-relative-p doesn't help, Miles Bader, 2006/06/26
- RE: doc string for face-attribute-relative-p doesn't help, Drew Adams, 2006/06/26
- Re: doc string for face-attribute-relative-p doesn't help, Miles Bader, 2006/06/26
- RE: doc string for face-attribute-relative-p doesn't help, Drew Adams, 2006/06/27
- Re: doc string for face-attribute-relative-p doesn't help, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/27
- Re: doc string for face-attribute-relative-p doesn't help, Miles Bader, 2006/06/28
Re: doc string for face-attribute-relative-p doesn't help, John S. Yates, Jr., 2006/06/26