Re: address@hidden: Re: emacsclient additional arguments buried]

[Chong Yidong]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     What exactly needs to be done here?  If we don't want the additional
>     files to be buried, that is easy enough to do (one-liner patch below).
>     But I'm not sure that is the correct thing to do---it could be
>     construed as interfering with the server's buffer setup.
>
> I think he wants them to go at the front of the buffer list,
> as if each one had been visited when the server asked for it.
>
> At the same time, I can see how this might be undesirable for some
> users.

I suggest leaving the code alone, and simply mentioning this in the
manual node on "Invoking Emacsclient".  OK?