[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange eval-after-load
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Strange eval-after-load |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jul 2006 13:02:46 -0400 |
Btw, the original text I wrote for this tip was a bit different, it
explicitly said that eval-after-load increases a coupling between the
two packages, which is a maintenance burden:
What you wrote is true, but not specific. Coupling between modules is
often necessary. There are many kinds of coupling, and not all of
them are bad. I replaced it with text that is more specific--it
explains why this kind of coupling is particularly bad.
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, (continued)
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Nick Roberts, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, David Kastrup, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/06
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, David Kastrup, 2006/07/06
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/07
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/07
- Re: Strange eval-after-load,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/03