[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange eval-after-load
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Strange eval-after-load |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:01:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi, Richard!
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:51:33AM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> To construe this form as "modifying the behaviour of another Lisp file
> (?edebug, presumably) in an invisible way" seems like a total perversion
> of reality to me.
> I'm sorry you don't see it, but I don't see any further way to try to
> explain.
OK. I seem to be in a small minority on this point. As I said
yesterday, I accept your decision as project maintainer and all-round good
guy. At the same time, as a matter of self respect, I won't be actively
making changes in the source which seem bad to me. I don't see there
should be any more problems on this score.
Let's finish this discussion - there are more important things to do.
--
Alan.
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, (continued)
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Nick Roberts, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, David Kastrup, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/06
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, David Kastrup, 2006/07/06
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/07
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/07
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/03