Re: Building Emacs overflowed pure space

[Richard Stallman]

    > I see no good reason why each expansion of `dolist' should use a
    > different symbol.  Maybe we can arrange to use one symbol over and
    > over again.  Does this work?

    Does that really work with nested dolist calls?

It ought to; each one will refer to its own binding.

It would work with an ordinary interned symbol, too.
The only reason to use an uninterned symbol is to avoid
interfering with any possible user program.