[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: safe_call1 considered harmful
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: safe_call1 considered harmful |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:37:04 -0400 |
But, by considering this problem again, I found another
solution than calling find-operation-coding-system with
(FILENAME . BUFFER). That is to provide an extra argument
BUFFER.
Would you please be more concrete? Passing an extra argument to a set
of functions is very incompatible.
- safe_call1 considered harmful, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/21
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/07/23
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/24
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/07/30
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/07/31
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/07/31