[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs geometry
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs geometry |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:06:00 +0300 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:15:10 -0700
>
> With emacs -Q:
>
> The initial frame is 2 or 3 cm from the upper left of the display (more or
> less like what happens if you do (set-frame-position (selected-frame) 100
> 100)); in the past, the initial frame has always been flush with top left.
With "emacs -Q" and without any geometry definitions in the registry,
this is now the intended behavior. I think it's an improvement over
what was before, but that's me.
- Re: Emacs geometry, (continued)
- Re: Emacs geometry, Nick Roberts, 2006/07/31
- Re: Emacs geometry, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/31
- Re: Emacs geometry, Kim F. Storm, 2006/07/30
- Re: Emacs geometry, Ralf Angeli, 2006/07/30
- Re: Emacs geometry, David Kastrup, 2006/07/30
- Re: Emacs geometry, Stefan Monnier, 2006/07/31
- Re: Emacs geometry, Ralf Angeli, 2006/07/31
- Re: Emacs geometry, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/07/27
- Re: Emacs geometry, Ralf Angeli, 2006/07/25
- Re: Emacs geometry, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/25
- Re: Emacs geometry,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Emacs geometry, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/24
RE: Emacs geometry, Drew Adams, 2006/07/27
RE: Emacs geometry, Drew Adams, 2006/07/27