Re: Emacs geometry

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Ralf Angeli <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:20:42 +0200
> 
> * Drew Adams (2006-07-25) writes:
> 
> > I understand the motivation, but I, for one, don't like this improvement one
> > bit. I don't remember seeing this design change discussed, BTW.
> 
> Look in emacs-pretest-bug.  The thread is called "startup frame
> position".
> 
> > First, `default-frame-alist' should be rigorously respected - it seems to be
> > ignored wrt position now.
> 
> Have you checked with the current source?

Sridhar Boovaraghavan reports that geometry specification in the
Registry is not honored.  If that is true, it's a bug that should be
fixed.  Could you please look into it?