Re: Tiny change to find-tag-default.

[martin rudalics]

> But I'm puzzled by the use of (forward-sexp -1) in the old code.  What
> subtle effect did the author intend by using that?  Maybe to get to
> the function name in a function call?  ... if that was the intention,
> it doesn't seem to work.

Probably someone wanted to allow `forward-sexp-function' to kick in.

I think `find-tag-default-function' is the right place to handle this in
a mode specific way.