[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Canceling dialogues
From: |
Stuart D. Herring |
Subject: |
Re: Canceling dialogues |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:43:17 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.6-7.el3.7lanl |
> If you use the menus in Emacs to call a function and this function for
> example calls y-or-n-p then a popup dialog will be shown (if
> use-dialog-box is t). This dialog box can not be canceled, at least not
> on w32.
>
> I think this is a bug and that a third alternative for canceling should
> be added.
What should y-or-n-p return if the user chooses this alternative? Should
it signal 'quit (like C-g would)? What if `inhibit-quit' is t? The idea
of an escape route for the user is not a bad one, but I wonder if the
notion of "cancelling" is insufficiently generalizable to apply to just
any use of `y-or-n-p'. Is there a specific behavior that you would want
to associate with this?
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
- Re: Canceling dialogues, (continued)
- Re: Canceling dialogues, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31
- Re: Canceling dialogues, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/31
- Re: Canceling dialogues, Jason Rumney, 2006/07/31
- Re: Canceling dialogues, David Kastrup, 2006/07/31
- Re: Canceling dialogues, Lennart Borgman, 2006/07/31
Re: Canceling dialogues,
Stuart D. Herring <=
Re: Canceling dialogues, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31
Re: Canceling dialogues, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31