[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Canceling dialogues
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Canceling dialogues |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:57:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
> Stuart D. Herring wrote:
>> What should y-or-n-p return if the user chooses this alternative? Should
>> it signal 'quit (like C-g would)? What if `inhibit-quit' is t? The idea
>> of an escape route for the user is not a bad one, but I wonder if the
>> notion of "cancelling" is insufficiently generalizable to apply to just
>> any use of `y-or-n-p'. Is there a specific behavior that you would want
>> to associate with this?
>>
> I want the Cancel alternative to work just like C-g works in the
> command line alternative.
Well, it sounds like there would not be much of a point to display a
cancel button if inhibit-quit is t, and it would also appear
inappropriate to ring the bell (which is usually done for a lot of
situations where quit is signaled).
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Canceling dialogues, (continued)
- Re: Canceling dialogues, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31
- Re: Canceling dialogues, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/31
- Re: Canceling dialogues, Jason Rumney, 2006/07/31
- Re: Canceling dialogues, David Kastrup, 2006/07/31
- Re: Canceling dialogues, Lennart Borgman, 2006/07/31
Re: Canceling dialogues, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/07/31
Re: Canceling dialogues, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31
Re: Canceling dialogues, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31