[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++]
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++] |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:15:25 -0400 |
I believe "GNU Emacs" is used mainly for unambiguous identification
rather than connecting it with the GNU system - much like "John of
Gaunt" is used to clarify which John you're talking about rather than to
associate him with the town of Gent in Belgium.
Yes, exactly.
> For distinguishing the two versions I write "Emacs" and "XEmacs",
> because the context shows we are talking about these two variants
> of the original GNU Emacs.
This leaves a difficulty when there is no context. For example, you
might find this in an overview of editors:
In an overview of editors there will be a place to provide the context
to explain what "Emacs" and "XEmacs" refer to, their history (joint
and separate), etc.
- Re: address@hidden: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++], (continued)
- Re: address@hidden: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++], Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/02
- Re: address@hidden: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++], Aidan Kehoe, 2006/08/02
- Re: address@hidden: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++], David Kastrup, 2006/08/02
- Re: address@hidden: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++], Richard Stallman, 2006/08/02
- Re: address@hidden: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++], Alan Mackenzie, 2006/08/03
- Re: address@hidden: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++], David Kastrup, 2006/08/03
- Re: address@hidden: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++], Aidan Kehoe, 2006/08/03
- Re: address@hidden: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++],
Richard Stallman <=