Re: Crash building unicode2, NSTATICS too low, pure space overflow.

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Jan Djärv <address@hidden> writes:

> Kenichi Handa skrev:
>> In article <address@hidden>, Richard
>> Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>>> 1026 is 0x402, 1280 is 0x500.  What is the good value
>>> for NSTATICS this time; 0x600 or 0x602?
>> 
>>> Try 0x7f0.  That should fit nicely in a block that
>>> malloc can get with no wasted space.
>> 
>> Thank you.  I've just installed that change.

> I don't see this change in HEAD or emacs-unicode2.  Where
> did you check it in?

Sorry, I've committed the change surely this time (not to
0x7f0 but to 0x600 according to this RMS's mail).

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> I had forgotten that.  Since it is statically allocated,
> might as well just make it 0x600.  It will last us another
> few years.

---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden