Re: jit-lock timer etc.

[Kim F. Storm]

address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:

>> However, returning the value in floating point might be a good method.
>
> That would be much better and cleaner, IMO.
> And we can leave time-to-seconds where it is!
>
>> But if we do that, we should call it float-idle-time.
>
> The doc string will tell that the return value is a float.

Actually, the return value of the new `current-idle-time' will be
either a float or nil (if not idle).

So the name `float-idle-time' would be misleading!

Shall I fix current-idle-time to return a float or nil?

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk