[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man'
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man' |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Sep 2006 02:57:22 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> BTW, I have the desire to marry man and woman so they would share the
> common history. Is this a good idea?
>
> It isn't necessary for them to get married; they just have to
> interchange internal information between their bodies ;-).
>
> I think this is a bug fix. Please make it happen.
While testing this change, I discovered one strange old bug (I can
reproduce it at least in the last year's CVS check-out, but not
in CVS check-out of two years ago). man fails in woman's frame.
Test case:
M-x man RET man RET ;; creates a new window in the same frame
M-x woman RET man RET ;; creates a new dedicated frame
q ;; deletes the buffer, but leaves the frame
M-x man RET man RET
the last command typed in the woman's dedicated frame fails with the error
signalled by string-match:
Man-translate-references: Wrong type argument: arrayp, nil
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man',
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man', Richard Stallman, 2006/09/04
- Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man', Juri Linkov, 2006/09/04
- Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man', Michael Welsh Duggan, 2006/09/04
- Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man', Michael Welsh Duggan, 2006/09/04
- Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man', Michael Welsh Duggan, 2006/09/05
- Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man', Michael Welsh Duggan, 2006/09/05
- Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man', Chong Yidong, 2006/09/05
- Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man', Richard Stallman, 2006/09/06
- Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man', Richard Stallman, 2006/09/07
- Re: Links in WoMan buffer should not call `man', Richard Stallman, 2006/09/06