[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:44:23 +0900 |
It's almost certainly intentional that it uses delq. A timer is a
unique entity.
If application code can create multiple timers and doesn't save all the
corresponding cookies for deletion, it's obviously a bug in that
application code.
-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
- Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?, Drew Adams, 2006/09/04
- Re: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/05
- RE: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?, Drew Adams, 2006/09/05
- Re: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/05
- RE: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?, Drew Adams, 2006/09/05
- Re: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/09/05
- RE: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?, Drew Adams, 2006/09/05
- Re: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?, Miles Bader, 2006/09/05
- RE: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?, Drew Adams, 2006/09/05
- Re: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?, Miles Bader, 2006/09/05
- RE: Should `cancel-timer' use `delete' instead of `delq'?, Drew Adams, 2006/09/06