[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken sit-for
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Broken sit-for |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Sep 2006 23:26:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Michaël Cadilhac) writes:
> I still think this line should be slightly changed to say something
> about zero (and negative) values of SECONDS.
To me it seems quite obvious that "seconds <= 0" implies "waited the full time".
But if you can suggest something better, please do.
>
>>> (t
>>> (or nodisp (redisplay))
>>> (let ((read (read-event nil nil seconds)))
>>> (or (null read)
>>> (progn (push read unread-command-events) nil))))))
>>
>> This does not interfere with the myriad of other
>> unread-command-events like variables we have? They are sure to be
>> unused at this point of time?
>
> Well, it actually triggers a problem. See the thread « The order input
> events are processed. »
See my answer to that thread.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Minor fix for life.el., Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/09/06
- Re: Minor fix for life.el., David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Re: Minor fix for life.el., Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/09/06
- Re: Minor fix for life.el., David Kastrup, 2006/09/06
- Broken sit-for [was: Re: Minor fix for life.el.], Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/07
- Re: Broken sit-for, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/09/08
- Re: Broken sit-for [was: Re: Minor fix for life.el.], Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/09
- Re: Broken sit-for, David Kastrup, 2006/09/09
- Re: Broken sit-for, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/09/10
- Re: Broken sit-for,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Broken sit-for, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/09/11
- Re: Broken sit-for, Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/10