[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rcirc bug
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: rcirc bug |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Sep 2006 22:57:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I think it would be better to change pushnew to expand
> into code that does not call any cl functions. Then programs
> that load cl at compile time could use pushnew without problems.
Is there really a problem? Can someone tell me how to reproduce this
with a simple test case? I tried made a file with the following
contents:
(eval-when-compile (require 'cl))
(defvar foo nil)
(defun foobar () (interactive) (pushnew 1 foo))
Upon byte compiling and loading the byte-compiled file, `M-x foobar'
seemed to work fine.
Didn't the rcirc bug turn out to come from another source (incorrect
use of `case')?
- rcirc bug, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/04
- Re: rcirc bug, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/05
- Re: rcirc bug, Ryan Yeske, 2006/09/05
- Re: rcirc bug, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/05
- Re: rcirc bug, Ryan Yeske, 2006/09/07
- Re: rcirc bug, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/08
- RE: rcirc bug, Drew Adams, 2006/09/08
- Re: rcirc bug,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: rcirc bug, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/09/11
- Re: rcirc bug, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/11
Re: rcirc bug, Magnus Henoch, 2006/09/05
Re: rcirc bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/05