[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:42:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> I don't know whqether it's uncommon or not, but if a packages uses
>> libtool with "-version-info M:N:L" argument, the above line
>> appears. It may be too ad hoc but we can tell font-lock
>> that a line matching with the regexp "-version-info [0-9]"
>> is not an error message (if font-lock accepts such a
>> request).
>
> I don't see a straightforward way of doing this, but I guess it's
> worth a shot.
On further consideration, it's impossible to handle this perfectly:
consider compiling a file named "foo -version-info 1", which gives
rise to the error message
foo -version-info 1:0: blah blah
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Kenichi Handa, 2006/09/06
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Chong Yidong, 2006/09/10
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Kenichi Handa, 2006/09/10
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/11
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/13
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/13
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Chong Yidong, 2006/09/13
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/15
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/15
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/16
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Juri Linkov, 2006/09/17
- Re: subtle problem of font-lock in *compilation* buffer, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/18