Re: line-move-partial too costly ?

[Miles Bader]

address@hidden (Micha.ANkl Cadilhac) writes:
> I don't think my computer, with an Athlon XP 2000+, is too old to not
> be concerned by Emacs user-friendliness :-)
>
> With emacs -Q, if I entirely  fill the scratch buffer (150 columns, 75
> lines) and then  press C-n and _stay on it_,[1]  the cursor is blocked
> at the second line. When C-n is released, Emacs responds only after
> a second or so.

Something seems very strange -- I'm on a slower computer than you, but
see absolutely no slowdown in the above scenario....  This is true
whether I use -q or not.

-Miles

-- 
$B<+$i$r6u$K$7$F!"?4$r3+$/;~!"F;$O3+$+$l$k(B