Re: address@hidden: WoMan Bug]

[David Hansen]

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:36:59 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote:

>>> Would someone please fix this, then ack?
>
>> The following patch would appear to fix this problem:
>
> I believe the right patch is to change the marker's insertion type (so that
> insertions are automatically made "before").  The patch below does that at
> the spot caught by the OP.  There might be other places where we need some
> fixup, so please try it and tell me if you hit the "Internal error" check
> or not (and if you do, please provide a backtrace).
>

Now i get:

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Internal error: wrong marker type")
  signal(error ("Internal error: wrong marker type"))
  error("Internal error: wrong marker type")
  woman2-process-escapes(#<marker at 90 in *WoMan 1 screen*> numeric)
  woman2-format-paragraphs(#<marker at 90 in *WoMan 1 screen*> 5)
  woman2-SH(#<marker at 90 in *WoMan 1 screen*>)
  woman2-roff-buffer()
  woman-decode-region(1 146569)
  woman-decode-buffer()
  woman-process-buffer()
  woman-really-find-file("/usr/share/man/man1/screen.1.gz" t "*WoMan 1 screen*")
  woman-find-file("/usr/share/man/man1/screen.1.gz")
  woman(nil nil)
  call-interactively(woman)
  execute-extended-command(nil)
  call-interactively(execute-extended-command)

David