[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TeX input method
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: TeX input method |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:55:51 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> So in essence you consider it more important to stick as close as possible
> to TeX for those potential users who may want to abuse the input method as
> a sort of coding-system, even if if means annoying the actual daily users of
> this input method?
> In this case I think we should "fix" the TeX input method to be more like
> TeX? E.g. map `SPC SPC SPC ...' to " "?
> More seriously: the TeX input method is really not like TeX. It's only
> using TeX as a basis so that people who know TeX get the benefit of reusing
> the same names for the same chars.
I tend to agree with that. An input method should be
designed to make inputting the most convenient. It may be
ok to use a data of some input method as a sort of
coding-system, but that priority should be lower than the
original intention of an input method.
So, the only question is whether Stefan's change is worth
breaking backward compatiblity or not.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- TeX input method, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/03
- Re: TeX input method, David Kastrup, 2006/10/03
- Re: TeX input method, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/03
- Re: TeX input method, David Kastrup, 2006/10/03
- Re: TeX input method, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/03
- Re: TeX input method,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: TeX input method, Miles Bader, 2006/10/05
- Re: TeX input method, David Kastrup, 2006/10/05
- Re: TeX input method, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/05
- Re: TeX input method, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/05
- Re: TeX input method, David Kastrup, 2006/10/05
- Re: TeX input method, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/05
- Re: TeX input method, Kim F. Storm, 2006/10/06