Re: TeX input method

[David Kastrup]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>> So, the only question is whether Stefan's change is worth
>> breaking backward compatiblity or not.
>
> Why not have "tex-discreet" and "tex-pedantic" input methods, the latter
> being the current input method, and the former being Stefan's slightly
> modified version.  The name "tex" could be an alias for one of those
> (which one I don't know, but I tend towards the former).
>
> [I agree with Stefan that the tex input method is a convenient thing to
> turn on for getting random weird characters, and that I'd prefer that it
> be unintrusive more than it be strictly the same as tex in all those
> weird corner cases.]

Well, I have to agree with Stefan that the sequences starting with {
seem somewhat pointless for an input encoding.  But ~ is a different
beast.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum