[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Emacs 21"
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: "Emacs 21" |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:34:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Stuart D. Herring" <address@hidden> writes:
> By "properly", do you mean "recognize as distinct from all prior (and
> perhaps subsequent) Emacs versions, or do you merely mean that they should
> not produce literally false output (e.g., diagnosing Emacs 22 as 20)? Or
> do you mean that all such tests should make logical divisions such as
> "older than Emacs 21" and "not older than Emacs 21", regardless of which
> divisions they make? Finally, can such tests use `emacs-major-version'
> and such, introduced in 19.23?
People writing software for Emacs 19.23 would better consult the Emacs
Lisp manual corresponding to their version of Emacs.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: "Emacs 21", (continued)
- Re: "Emacs 21", Richard Stallman, 2006/10/06
Re: "Emacs 21", Stuart D. Herring, 2006/10/06