[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:19:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> Maybe the problem is that `this-command-keys' has several potential uses and
> they are incompatible: in one case one wants this-command-keys to list the
> keys the user has typed (independently from whether or not some of those
> keys were later read&unread&reread&reunread&rereread), whereas in the other
> one wants the exact key-sequence which triggered this command, so we can
> push it back on unread-command-events to force re-interpretation of
> those keys.
Given that the code has been around for 8 years, changing it at this
point in the release process might be a disaster. It's not even clear
to me what TRT is in this case. I suggest leaving the current
behavior as it is for Emacs 22; any user-level Lisp code that bumps
into this can quite easily work around it by checking if this-command
is eq to universal-argument.
Then maybe we can revisit this issue after the release. WDYT?
- Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/14
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/16
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/16
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/17
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/17
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/17
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/17
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/17
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/17
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/18
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/18
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/18
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/19
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/19
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/19
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Johan Bockgård, 2006/10/19
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/18
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/18
- Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h, Kim F. Storm, 2006/10/19