Re: Keybinding nit

[Miles Bader]

Peter Lee <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm not sure why Emacs, in general, doesn't leverage the upper-case
> binding for variations on a command.  It seems intuitive to me.

Well at least historically, I suppose one reason is because such
combinations (control + shift) don't work on ttys.

Perhaps they'd make sense as "optional" bindings these days, but if you
do that _too_ much, there's a risk of tilting the entire keybinding
scheme in a way that makes tty usage more difficult.

-Miles
-- 
`To alcohol!  The cause of, and solution to,
 all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson