Re: Keybinding nit

[Kevin Rodgers]

Miles Bader wrote:
> Peter Lee <address@hidden> writes:
> > I'm not sure why Emacs, in general, doesn't leverage the upper-case
> > binding for variations on a command.  It seems intuitive to me.
>
> Well at least historically, I suppose one reason is because such
> combinations (control + shift) don't work on ttys.

But that's not what Peter wrote; he's using the same `C-x' prefix
in all cases, just varying the case of the final key:

>> C-x 4 k - kill other buffer
>> C-x 4 K - kill other buffer and delete the window
>>
>> C-x k - kill buffer
>> C-x K - kill buffer and delete the window

--
Kevin