[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GFortran
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GFortran |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:02:26 +0900 |
Steve Kargl <address@hidden> writes:
> I disagree. Gfortran's error mechanism can span multiple lines.
> The GNU form can't.
It is _not_ being suggested that all the gfortan error info be replaced
with something worse.
It is simply being requested that any information which has a "standard"
form be presented in (at least) that way -- additional information for
humans is of course good too, and can remain in the current format.
-Miles
--
The car has become... an article of dress without which we feel uncertain,
unclad, and incomplete. [Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964]
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Nick Roberts, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Tobias Burnus, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Miles Bader, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, FX Coudert, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Miles Bader, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31