[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GFortran
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GFortran |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:37:08 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
> To make gfortran conform to
> http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#index-error-messages_002c-formatting-31
> requires more than the 2 line patch posted earlier.
Could be, but the 2 line patch is all that's needed in practice to make the
format follow at least the main part of the standard. The more complex
parts of the standard (e.g. the <file1>:<line1>-<file2>:<line2>) are pretty
dubious anyway: I've never seen them used and they are likely to suffer from
ambiguity (if you file names look like numbers, typically).
> There are
> at least 1022 possible routes to show_locus.
> troutmask:sgk[207] grep gfc_error *c | wc -l
> 891
> troutmask:sgk[208] grep gfc_warning *c | wc -l
> 64
> troutmask:sgk[210] grep gfc_notify *c | wc -l
> 67
Why would that matter?
Stefan
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Warren Turkal, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Chong Yidong, 2006/11/02
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, David Kastrup, 2006/11/03