Re: Emacs and GFortran

[Steven Bosscher]

On 11/3/06, Alfred M. Szmidt <address@hidden> wrote:
> I really do not wish to partake in this anymore, but I cannot let this
> slide.
>
>    Should gfortran conform to the GNU standards? Preferably yes.  But
>    if no developer (volunteer!) cares to make it so, tough luck but it
>    is not going to happen.
>
> I volunteered.

Yes, and that's really sweet of you.

>  And now you are calling me of all people hostile and
> on top of that ignorant?

No, I call you "not listening"...

You've been told many times now that the patches you posted are just
wrong. But you still insist that you've posted the solution and that
everyone should just ignore the fact that you:
a) did not test the patch
b) did not understand the parts of the compiler you're changing


> The fix in question is so trivial that it
> takes more time to read your message than actually fixing it!

See?
Not listening.

> Steve
> Kargl might have not been very cooperative,

> It is no wonder
> why gfortran has so few volunteer when they try to chase away anyone
> who tries to contribute anything to the project.

*laughs*

I don't know what project you're looking at, but it seems to me that
gfortran no problem at all to attract developers.  Granted,
discussions like this one don't help. But there are, I don't know, 12?
15? active gfortran developers, and that's more than any other front
end.

If you want to make a point, don't use such rediculous arguments.

Gr.
Steven