Re: message's docstring

[David Kastrup]

"Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:

> On 11/12/06, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> That sounds nonsensical.  Shouldn't this be
>> (y-or-n-p (format ...))
>> instead?
>
> Surely yes. But the fact that it did work till now is because message
> returns the message string.
>
> So, either we document it, or document that the result is irrelevant
> (but it certainly doesn't look so, looking at the code).

But we should let ourselves be governed rather by code working as
intended rather than stuff in need of fixing.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum