[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS commits and logs
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: CVS commits and logs |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 04:44:35 -0500 |
Not only would using CVS only be a lot more work (it's not something I
want to do), but it _would not fix the problem_.
Please explain why not. Your previous message said the problem
results from use of arch. Are you now saying that a similar problem
happens when CVS is used to merge one branch into another?
If so, please describe the scenario and the problem.
Remember that we are talking about merging the unicode-2 branch
into the trunk.
If somebody has a concrete suggestion, by all means give it. I've made
one (adding CVS tags to allow doing the the necessary "indirection"
without worrying about arch), which I think is imperfect, but certainly
a workable solution.
I do not understand what that means. I am not an expert on CVS.
Please explain to me the solution you proposed, and what problem
it is supposed to solve.
- Re: Switching to Subversion, (continued)
- Re: Switching to Subversion, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2006/11/13
- Re: Switching to Subversion, Masatake YAMATO, 2006/11/13
- Re: Switching to Subversion, Eric Hanchrow, 2006/11/13
- Re: Switching to Subversion, Miles Bader, 2006/11/13
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/12
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/12
- Re: CVS commits and logs,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Reiner Steib, 2006/11/07
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/07
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/07
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Reiner Steib, 2006/11/11
Re: CVS commits and logs, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/05