Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode"

[Richard Stallman]

    It seems that about half the people who posted something about
    font-lock-support-mode are aware of jit-lock mode whereas
    the other half got stuck with lazy-lock mode. My guess is that people 
actively 
    tracking the latest CVS branch (and thus the pretest version)
    are well aware of jit-lock mode and the people who have not
    bothered with CVS version wrote about lazy-lock vs fast-lock and
    have not updated the web pages for some time.

What would people think of making font-lock-support-mode a no-op, and
creating some new variable people can use if they really want to use
something else instead of jit-lock?