Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 49, Issue 33

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:09:41 +0000
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Subject: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/lispref/makefile.w32-in,v
> To: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> 
> CVSROOT:      /cvsroot/emacs
> Module name:  emacs
> Changes by:   Juanma Barranquero <lektu>      06/12/07 18:09:41
> 
> Index: makefile.w32-in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lispref/makefile.w32-in,v
> retrieving revision 1.17
> retrieving revision 1.18
> diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
> --- makefile.w32-in   30 Oct 2006 14:15:57 -0000      1.17
> +++ makefile.w32-in   7 Dec 2006 18:09:41 -0000       1.18
> @@ -119,5 +119,5 @@
>  
>  distclean: clean
>  
> -maintainer-clean: clean
> -     - $(DEL) elisp elisp-* elisp.dvi elisp.oaux
> +maintainer-clean: distclean
> +     - $(DEL) elisp.dvi elisp.oaux
> 

Why did you make this change?  lispref/Makefile.in still removes the
results of makeinfo, evidently to support a separate lispref
packaging.  Why shouldn't makefile.w32-in follow suit?