[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Dec 2006 03:51:50 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Stephen Leake <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:40:07 -0500
>
> I don't have anything to add directly to this discussion, but it would
> help tremendously if people would put _explanations_ in the changelog,
> instead of just listing the changes.
ChangeLog files are not supposed to explain, just list the changes.
The explanations should be in the comments in the changed file itself.
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, (continued)
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Stephen Leake, 2006/12/22
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Stephen Leake, 2006/12/24
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/25
- Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/27
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/22
nt/makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/20
Re: nt/makefile.w32-in, LENNART BORGMAN, 2006/12/22