[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7
|
From: |
Nick Roberts |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:46:24 +1300 |
> The original text was completely neutral, whereas the new one is so
> grotesque that it's at best suitable for anti.texi, and at worst is an
> insult to the reader's intelligence.
Yes, I agree. I think we should spend our energy improving free software, not
vilifying Microsoft.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/02
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/01/02
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/02
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, Kim F. Storm, 2007/01/03
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, Jason Rumney, 2007/01/03
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, Kim F. Storm, 2007/01/03
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, Richard Stallman, 2007/01/03
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2007/01/03
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, David Kastrup, 2007/01/04
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, Kim F. Storm, 2007/01/04
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, David Kastrup, 2007/01/04
- Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7, Jan Djärv, 2007/01/04