[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transpose-sexps
From: |
Stuart D. Herring |
Subject: |
Re: transpose-sexps |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:06:09 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8-2.el3.7lanl |
> It is probably possible to ask current major mode if we are in a string.
> If it is not possible, than it is probably worth it to invent a consistent
> interface that major modes would implement. I agree that it is not to be
> done now, of course. (And while I'm at it, it's a pity that "now" spans
> the last two years or so.)
Again, this is not a question of inventiveness, consistency, or any other
kind of design or programming at all. It's a mathematical question,
really: it is easy to ask the question and to devise a mechanism for doing
so, but it is algorithmically non-trivial to determine the answer. As
Richard has said, it might be possible to use the (new, complicated)
syntax caching support to answer this question in a reasonable amount of
time, at which point we can consider making C-M-t consult that.
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
- transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Andreas Schwab, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Miles Bader, 2007/01/05
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/05
- Re: transpose-sexps,
Stuart D. Herring <=
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Andreas Schwab, 2007/01/05
- Re: transpose-sexps, Richard Stallman, 2007/01/04