Re: New pretest tarball 22.0.93

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 1/26/07, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:

> 4 pretest tarballs is not too many, I think.

No, of course not. I'm more worried by the month-long interval between
pretests than the number of them. 30 days is enough for us to grow
restless and leave us susceptible to featurettes posing as
bug-fixes... (I have this mental image of us developers like the guys
in Starship Troopers, surrounded by nasty, mean-looking bugs.)

> during the pretest of Emacs 21,
> I think many pretesters would send email short time after another
> pretest was tarred, saying they have the new version up and running.
> Perhaps we should ask them to provide this information now.

Agreed.

                   /L/e/k/t/u