[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:52:59 -0500 |
> * emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el (byte-compile-disable-print-circle): New
> variable.
I think it's better to use a "positive" name, like
`byte-compile-print-circle' (defaulting to t).
Then it's more natural regardless of the default value (I can imagine
that we might decide to change that later), whereas names like
"...-disable-..." really only sound right if their default value is nil.
I think it is better if the default is nil, so let's stay with the
current name.
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences, (continued)
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences, Richard Stallman, 2007/01/29
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences, Richard Stallman, 2007/01/28
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/27
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences, Andreas Schwab, 2007/01/27
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences, Kim F. Storm, 2007/01/27
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences, Richard Stallman, 2007/01/28
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences, Miles Bader, 2007/01/27
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences, Richard Stallman, 2007/01/28
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences, Kenichi Handa, 2007/01/28
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences, Miles Bader, 2007/01/28
- Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences,
Richard Stallman <=