[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:02:48 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> File name, including directory, of user's initialization file.
>> If the file loaded had extension `.elc', and the corresponding source file
>> exists, this variable contains the name of source file, suitable for use
>> by functions like `custom-save-all' which edit the init file.
>
> I think we should *strongly* recommend not to compile the .emacs file.
> It's a dumb thing to do, unless you're a masochist anyway.
Currently, the Emacs manual says
If you have a large amount of code in your `.emacs' file, you
should rename it to `~/.emacs.el', and byte-compile it. *Note Byte
Compilation: (elisp)Byte Compilation, for more information about
compiling Emacs Lisp programs.
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/01
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/02/02
- Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/02
Re: user-init-file source vs. compiled, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/02