Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 2/5/07, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:

> Since the presence of such entries is normal, `unload-feature' ought
> to handle such entries in a useful way.
>
> Would someone like to implement this?

That's what my patch does: the useful thing for (autoload . SYMBOL) is
treat it like a defun, and the useful thing for (defface . SYMBOL) is
ignore it.

> Meanwhile, I think another change is needed to handle `(t . SYMBOL)'
> elements correctly.  See below.  Does anyone else see a problem in it?

It seems correct, except that

> !          (t (setq restore-autoload (cdr x)))

should be

> !          ((t) (setq restore-autoload (cdr x)))

because a t alone is equivalent to `otherwise'.

                   /L/e/k/t/u