[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Image mode
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Image mode |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:06:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2/6/07, Chong Yidong <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> OK, here is my stab at this.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Here are three schemes.
>
> AFAICS, all schemes are abandoning the idea of protecting (or at least
> warning) the user against potentially dangerous but correctly named
> image files; is that so?
Why would a user open a binary file in anything but hexl-mode?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Image mode, (continued)
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, David Kastrup, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, David Kastrup, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, David Kastrup, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, David Kastrup, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, David Kastrup, 2007/02/06