Re: cannot understand Elisp manual node Glyphs

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 2/9/07, Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> wrote:

> WDOT ??

I think it's not a new feature, it's much cleaner that the current
way, and a needed abstraction.

It's a bit absurd IMO to be making deep changes to the way we support
images, user-wise, and then discuss about adding three functions,
almost one-liners, which improve clarity and documentation for a much
misunderstood feature.

(No, the above is not a cheap shot towards the image thread, just an
obvious example of not-so-trivial changes going on Right Now.)

                   /L/e/k/t/u