[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: constant `e'
|
From: |
djh |
|
Subject: |
Re: constant `e' |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:34:34 +0900 |
From: Jay Belanger <address@hidden>
>David Hansen <address@hidden> writes:
>> Despite being a maths graduate, I can't think of any other such constants
>> with anything like the universality of e and pi.
>
> 42
>Perhaps we should introduce the constant `math-42'.
>Jay
42 is just the answer as I recall.
I'm not convinced that it needs to have a contant definition.
Darel Henman
- Re: constant `e', (continued)
- Re: constant `e', Alan Mackenzie, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Jason Rumney, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', David Hansen, 2007/02/10
- RE: constant `e', Drew Adams, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e', Chong Yidong, 2007/02/10
- Re: constant `e',
djh <=